Christopher Flickinger is a writer for the conservative Human Events Online and, like all right-wing conservatives, I find him to be an interesting character. I ran into him because he attacks Ohio State University for pursuing a sexual harrassment suit against a librarian who recommended four conservative books to incoming freshmen. After reading
his article and then
his source, I agree. The investigation is a waste of time, and should be discarded.
In the article, though, is an attack against the "liberal" college atmosphere: "Universities are one of the most hostile places for Christians and conservatives in America." Shortly after this undefended accusation, was a sentence which perplexed me even further: "Curious as to which chapter of the Nazis Party was running this university, “the Dean” of Human Events U visited the school’s website..." Nazi's? Liberal Nazi's? I'm missing a correlation. Never in my wildest dreams did I figure Hitler or his chronies to be remotely liberal. Oddly, most conservatives detest the idea comparing Bush to Hitler, but they are quite alright with comparing liberals to Nazis.
So, I decided to read another of Christopher's writings. I thought
Student Sculpts with Conservative Firepower to be a good title, so I clicked. The article is about a "Blonde bombshell Kelly Spaulding" (on my rating scale, she's a 1) who created an "autobiographical chair ... sculpt[ed] around her conservative views." I like the chair: angels and tanks make for a great artistic combination.
Unfortunately, Kelly isn't quite as impressive as her chair. She states her "chair caricatures the left and their beliefs of what conservatives are: evil, war-hungry, mechanical, cold-hearted, the list goes on. Nevertheless, I find the duality of the chair with "angelic wings" ironic. It takes war to save people, to protect our country and our rights, and that it just part of what we stand for as conservatives." Which is a humorous stance, because liberals are certainly not against protecting our people or even going to war to do so. For example, in WWII it was the conservative party who argued for us to steer clear of the "Jewish war" and FDR who fought tooth and nail to defend Europe from Nazi occupation. Liberals, however, do have something against occupying a sovereign nation under false pretenses.
With no one to halt her ignorance, she goes on: "Moreover, the left wing on the chair is tucked down, lowered, to represent the cowardice of liberals that fail to protect our rights and merely attempt to hack away at them one by one." Although I recall nearly every congressman voting on the Patriot Act after the September 11th tragedy, only liberal congressman are reconsidering some of the language in the Act which restricts our civil rights. Our president seems content to spy on citizens without court approval, eroding a right of privacy which stems from the frightening and compulsive spying during the Cold War era (which was also done by conservatives).
I'll probably read more of Flickinger's articles in the future for my amuzement. Of course, if anyone has any far left liberal who writes as foolishly about conservatives, I'll be interested in laughing at them too (just try not to mention anyone at the Huffington Post because I already have a chuckle at many of their bloggers).
Don't die.